I was all

“AWWWWWW”
Then the mention of letters.. happened. And I was all

*sad kitten noises*
I was all

“AWWWWWW”
Then the mention of letters.. happened. And I was all

*sad kitten noises*
I’m glad, Nonnie! I am pretty passionate about having a range of people, and I try to make the ace characters all very different and all full of life.
(btw Frerin is totally akoiromantic)
There certainly can be an aro character who is not ace! Dang, I really need to do better on this front. I will do some more reading, and respectfully ask people about their experiences. Hopefully some of my aro friends will have a moment to share their hopes for representation (and their pet peeves) with me.
(btw, that is an open invitation, too. If you yourself would like to talk to me about this, Nonnie, I would be hugely honoured and grateful. You can remain on anon, and I will not publish publically. But there’s no obligation at all: please don’t feel pressured, either!)
I have an idea of who the character could be already. Bear with me: they’ll appear!
Okay, here’s a thing though: No soulmates in Sansukh.
Here’s why.
The fanon term ‘One’ has been widely used in the Hobbit fandom to describe a fated, pre-ordained, pre-destined match between two people, chosen for them by a third party (usually Aule), without any input from those involved. Often it’s implied that these people were destined for each other from birth or even before, which for me is an uncomfortable thought. Babies can’t choose, it’s not their choice, it’s someone else’s choice. I don’t find that romantic: I consider it more along the lines of an arranged marriage. I got creeped out by the lack of free will and lack of choice implied in this arrangement. And so I use the term sliiiightly differently.
Tolkien says (I’m paraphrasing, but still) that a Dwarf will only love once. If they can’t be with the one they love, then they devote their life to their work instead. So I use the term ‘One’ to mean “one that this Dwarf loves.”
So, there’s no real reason for there to be confirmation of fated Ones or no Ones. People are either romantic or not, sexual or not, and this informs their attractions and decisions in love, just as for any person in our own world. Free will, baby.
Many amazing and engaging fics use the term ‘One’ to mean pre-selected soulmate, and I have enjoyed those stories, and even recced them. I am not casting aspersions upon those stories or those writers. I am trying to explain my thought process, and what led me to steer clear of a widely-known fanon notion.
Balin is homoromantic ace, btw, and was in a past relationship with Nali which failed (but they remain friends). Nori is aroace, as is Dori. The other Aces of the Company in my fic are our friends Oin and Fili.
(YES I MADE UP MY MIND, HE IS DEMIROMANTIC ACE.)
Brother, I will kill you.

Hell yeah, he definitely does. So many pretty hobbity pins, hair-clasps, belt-buckles, pens (ohhh the PENS) and even a pocket-watch.
(and all of the flower ones have meanings. Because Thorin is a schmooplord and a nerd 😉 )
omfg Nonnie, dear lord that would have been… an experience. In fact, it sounds like it would have been several Experiences put together. O.O
GIMIZH ON ROCKET-FUEL COFFEE SOUNDS ABSOLUTELY TERRIFYING THOUGH

Ohhhhhhh :’) What a lovely notion, Nonnie.
PFFFFFFFFT YESSSSSSS <33333
AWWWWWW
one day, Gimizh. One day, Barur will not catch you… but it is not this day! (THAT DWARROW HAS EYES ON THE BACK OF HIS HEAD, IT ISN’T FAAAAIR)
I’m glad you like the notion, Nonnie! Here’s where I mention how the idea struck me. There is no gender-indicative pronoun used for Narvi in LOTR – though there may be one used elsewhere, i can’t remember and don’t really care, and here’s why:
I love Middle-Earth, and Tolkien’s incredible work, and especially Dwarves, okay, but I try always to be aware and acknowledge that Tolkien himself held catholic and patriarchal ideas about the place of women, and he was particularly repressive/dismissive when describing the place of women in his fantasy Dwarf society. As amazing as his achievements are, Tolkien failed women and girls back then. He absolutely failed to give equal – or even sufficient – representation. Women characters with spoken lines in LOTR can barely even be counted on two hands. There are NONE IN THE HOBBIT AT ALL. I can try and do something to change that: that’s the fun thing about transformative fanfic.
I am pretty sure if you re-read the above message you sent to me, you could pick out at least three reasons why I would write Narvi as a woman – not least of which is that there are quite enough men in this bloody universe already.
And so, yeah… I don’t really care if she ‘should’ be yet another man. She’s a woman to me – an impatient, sardonic, slightly haughty, incomparably genius black woman.
And tbh, my dearest Professor Tolkien, fuck the idea that women only matter to history because of the actions of their sons.