Acorn-related symbolism realisation omfg

okay, bear in mind that I still haven’t seen the extended Life-Ruiner. But I hear that Bilbs plants the acorn in Dale. And I wondered – whu, but why?

I know that for a lot of people, the acorn symbolises love (and my bagginshield-shipping heart rejoices) and I totally think that’s awesome too and this isn’t meant to stomp on that interpretation. It’s just that I had to think again what it was that Bilbo says when he first reveals the acorn:

One day it’ll grow. And every time I look at it, I’ll remember. Remember everything that happened: the good, the bad… and how lucky I am that I made it home.

This hit me like a freight train… 

Guys. 

GUYS.

The acorn is memory. He’s planting it where he doesn’t have to see it every day. He’s not planting it at home, at Bag End. He’s planting it far, far away from the Shire. He can’t look at it without a ridic long journey. 

Bilbo is purposefully trying to forget*. He doesn’t want to think of ‘the good, the bad, and how “”lucky”” [he] is that [he] made it home.’ He doesn’t want to remember. 

THIS IS THE BAGGINSHIELD EQUIVALENT OF ‘IF THIS IS LOVE I DO NOT WANT IT, TAKE IT AWAY, PLEASE’

EDIT: okay, I am informed that they still don’t show where Bilbs plants the acorn, though I just checked and there was apparently a scene shot of him planting it in Dale (from the Hobbit Companion Book)

*Bilbo’s later memory-problems now 905725% more tragic, thanks so much BOTFA

I haven’t yet been able to read the Silm, so I’m wondering what you mean by the oath in the ask about Tauriel and the Fëanorian’s?

greenekangaroo:

hamelin-born:

determamfidd:

hamelin-born:

determamfidd:

The Oath of Feanor. Tolkien calls it ‘a terrible and unbreakable oath… that should never have been taken.” It was spoken by Feanor and his seven sons after Morgoth nicked the Silmarils, and it was the driving force behind EPIC FIRST AGE PAIN AND ANGST.

Here is the Oath itself:

“Be he foe or friend, be he foul or clean,
brood of Morgoth or bright Vala,
Elda or Maia or Aftercomer,
Man yet unborn upon Middle-earth,
neither law, nor love, nor league of swords,
dread nor danger, not Doom itself,
shall defend him from Fëanor, and Fëanor’s kin,
whoso hideth or hoardeth, or in hand taketh,
finding keepeth or afar casteth
a Silmaril. This swear we all:
death we will deal him ere Day’s ending,
woe unto world’s end! Our word hear thou,
Eru Allfather! To the everlasting
Darkness doom us if our deed faileth.
On the holy mountain hear in witness
and our vow remember, Manwë and Varda!”

Basically, if you have a Silmaril and keep it, the Feanorians will come fuck you up. 

Sooo, descendants of Feanor though… it’s uncertain as to whether the children of his sons would be bound by the oath? I can’t remember if Celebrimbor is ever mentioned as being bound to it. Either which way, it is less like an oath in the end and more like a whip, driving them on and on to acts of both heroism and horror. They called upon Eru himself to be witness. Yikes. Yikes. 

(and this is also why I personally can’t see the Arkenstone as a Silmaril, though I can understand those who do! Pretty as it is, it doesn’t look like it contains the mingled holy light of Terlperion and Laurelin – but more importantly the doom of the Oath would then fall upon the Dwarves and haven’t they suffered enough without another massacre, guh. Not to mention, Sauron would also ve veeeery interested in getting one of his Master’s favourite shinies.

Oooh, but a fic where the last surviving son Maglor limps to the Lonely Mountain, weary unto death, but spurred onwards by the mercilessness of the Oath… eeeeeee that’d be kinda awesome…NO DETS NO)

…honestly, I think that Feanor and his (immediate) Offspring could only make the oath for themselves – not for those unborn. The option would be open, of course, for any of their kin to take it up, but – it’s their choice. It’s their choice, and theirs alone; one is not automatically bound by the promises and mistakes of their ancestors.

You’re likely right! As I said, I dunno. But I don’t wanna go fossicking through everrrrrything to find out for sure, bc that is waaaay too much effort!

Tagging greenekangaroo.

*knock politely*. If you don’t mind me asking, greenekangaroo, what are your thoughts on this? You know a *lot* more about the Silmarilion then I do.

I’ve always read the Oath almost as a spell- once spoken, once bound, there was no going back. That line, ‘Feanor’s Kin’, could have indeed fucked over every child and grandchild that the line produced. 

Barring that, the problem for the offspring of the Line of Feanor isn’t so much the Oath of the Feanorians as it was Mandos’ Doom of the Noldor, which was a prophecy/curse/Mandos being an asscanoe depending on who you talk to. By the time Celebrimbor came around, Beleriand was already underwater and according to some readings the Noldor’s Doom was lifted, or they were at least allowed back across the sea. 

I am vehemently against the Arkenstone being canonically a silmaril simply because it’s..not anywhere near where the one silmaril it could be was dropped? It makes no logistical sense? If the Arkenstone WAS a silmaril, it would have to be the one that Maedhros the One Handed took with him into a fiery chasm- and as far as anyone knows that fiery chasm was miles away from any dwarven stronghold. Even accounting for shifting rock, and I got nothing on the tectonic plates of Middle Earth, it would have had to move a long friggin’ way to get under the Lonely Mountain. 

(there is an argument here, of course, because why is the Lonely Mountain lonely if not for violent underground activity suddenly forming a single peak? My counter is if the Arkenstone was meant canonically to be a Silmaril, Galadriel would have come riding out of Lothlorien hellbent for bedlam. Her uncle made the silmarils, her cousins died for them, and Galadriel is not the kind of lady to give up that kind of power- and she knows dwarves well enough that she might have been able to get it.) 

I was and remain a bit leery about Tauriel’s red hair. I think it was a stylistic choice on the part of costuming, and Evangeline rocks it, but the fact remains that the only elves ever mentioned who had red hair had a really hard time of it. 

Excellent points, thanks – I hadn’t thought of what Galadriel might do!

Tauriel’s red hair – it appears that the movie!Silvan elves have all manner of hair colours (aviva0017 mentioned that quite a few of the Mirkwood guard have red/auburn hair? and that it is mentioned in the book that red hair is very rare, even amongst the Noldor). 

IDK, it’s a fun idea and all power to those who jive with it, but I personally prefer Tauriel as a Silvan Elf. It makes no sense to me for Thranduil to oppose a match between her and Legolas if she were a scion of one of the ancient great royal families. 

I’ve always assumed that the tendency to view Bilbo as perfect comes from it being written by him, and most readers aren’t astute enough to comprehend that, as the primary focus, he could be anything but flawless. They are self-inserting, since they want to see themselves as the primary focus of life, and want to be perfect themselves, so they ignore every mistake and flaw in Bilbo to make themselves feel better. They also feel every slight from Thorin to Bilbo deeper for the same reason.

avelera:

baggvinshield:

this could very well be the case for some readers, especially with regards to them not being astute enough to recognize bilbo as the unreliable narrator he is. but i find it nearly impossible to believe someone could watch the hobbit movies, actually watch them and actually spend even a couple minutes thinking about bilbo, and come away with this idea that bagginshield must be an unbalanced relationship because bilbo is Obviously Perfect and thorin is Obviously a PoS. (and so we have our trolls lol)

“But you know how things went, at any rate as Bilbo saw them. The story would sound rather different, if I had written it. For one thing he did not realize at all how fatuous the Dwarves thought him, nor how angry they were with me.” The Unfinished Tales by JRR Tolkien in other parts goes on to remind us that at many points the Company had to carry Bilbo because he couldn’t keep up with them (and he wasn’t light), that he was constantly complaining about everything, had no experience, and was in general a very unpleasant traveling companion. All things that Bilbo fails to mention in his own account, for obvious reasons. 

For real, though, Bilbo is kind of a jerk and that’s ok because perfect characters are boring and his arc is about him becoming a better person, not that he was some perfect ideally bucolic little hobbit from the beginning and ugh if I see this whole wide-eyed delicate innocent flower-child Bilbo one more time I’m going to lose my shit

avelera:

I would suggest that this idealization of Bilbo into an angelic figure was because people were getting Bilbo and Frodo mixed up, but the fact is that Frodo actually is a self-sacrificing cinnamon bun and he didn’t get nearly the level of idealization in fandom that Bilbo does, I swear to fuckin’ Mahal

6) Tolkien’s hero was average, and needed help, and failed.

This is the place where most fantasy authors, who love to simultaneously call themselves Tolkien’s heirs and blame him for a lot of what’s wrong with modern fantasy, err the worst. It’s hard to look at Frodo and see him as someone extra-special. The hints in the books that a higher power did choose him are so quiet as to be unnoticeable. And he wouldn’t have made it as far as he did without his companions. And he doesn’t keep from falling into temptation.

A lot of modern fantasy heroes are completely opposite from this. They start out extraordinary, and they stay that way. Other characters are there to train them, or be shallow antagonists and love interests and worshippers, not actually help them. And they don’t fail. (Damn it, I want to see more corrupted fantasy heroes.) It’s not fair to blame Tolkien for the disease that fantasy writers have inflicted on themselves. […]

Fantasy could use more ordinary people who are afraid and don’t know what the hell they’re doing, but volunteer for the Quest anyway.

It’s misinterpretation of Tolkien that’s the problem, not Tolkien himself.

“Tolkien Cliches,” Limyaael

(via mithtransdir)

This whole piece is worth a read.

(via janeymac-ie)

radiorcrist:

baggvinshield:

malmao:

radiorcrist:

nitocrisss:

excuse me but i’ve just found out that the 80th anniversary of marriage is caLLED “OAK WEDDING” AND I CANNOT

And here’s something to add to this. Bilbo was 51 when the quest happened and when botfa happened. Bilbo lived to be about 131 yrs before he set sail at the Grey Haven. That’s 80 years of Bilbo’s life without Thorin.

Thorin Oakenshield died in 2941. Bilbo Baggins was last seen in departing from the Grey Havens in 3021. 

That’s exactly eighty years and the traditional gift that is given in the U.K. on a couples eightieth wedding anniversary is something made of oak

You can go ahead and kill me now. I’m basically dead inside anyway. 

*genuinely begins to consider that tolkien is the Actual Father of bagginshield*

Don’t think of it as sad. Think of it this way. 

In honour of Thorin’s memory, Bilbo shows his love for the dwarf by continuing to live his life to the best he can, even if it was painful at times.

He took Frodo under his wing after his parents died. Samwise Gamgee wouldn’t be Samwise the Brave that we know, if it weren’t for Bilbo being his tutor. Bilbo did live a heavy burden of 60 years under the grasp of the One Ring, but he had been able to withstand the whispers of the Ring and give up his possession of it, with Gandalf’s help.

Free from the Ring, he took on his last adventure towards the east to Dale before going back and retiring Rivendell due to his rapid aging. In those remaining 20 years of his life, he devoted and continued his written account of the Thorin’s quest for Erebor.

It just seems so poetic and perfect that their years of separation, because of death, landed on the 80th wedding anniversary. Thorin told Bilbo that he should plant his [acorn] trees, and watch them grow.

Oak trees are one of the strongest wood in the world, and it symbolizes strength and endurance, as it stands strong through all the hardships of life.

Basically in this case, I like to think that Bilbo represents that acorn itself that grew into the oak tree. His love for Thorin grew as strong as an oak tree. And I just want to keep it in my heart that they reunite on this anniversary after all the hardship they have gone through after being separated from each other. (lmao I’m not listening to the fact that it’s impossible for them to meet in the afterlife and lol kinda went in Sansukh territory here haha)

BLESS YOU RADIO ❤

Praise be to Meta…

drsilverfish:

You go, meta writers, with your thinky thoughts and your “let’s
overthink this”, with your attention to set dressing and editing as well as
script and actor nuance, with your discussions about representation and what sorts
of worldviews media producers are replicating or, sometimes, challenging.

“Meta” is a wonderful phenomenon – it’s basically grassroots,
live, literary/ textual criticism, written for free by and for fan audiences, and
shared by them in active learning communities.

Most literary and textual criticism (because let’s face it
professional re-cappers and reviewers are mostly damn bad at informed critique)
is gated – it’s locked up in academic journals and conferences, and you can’t
get at it unless you have current membership of a university library. That’s
beginning to change, as some journals shift to “open source”, but at present,
the gates to the academy are still standing tall.

I loved literary criticism as an undergraduate but I felt
somewhat disillusioned about its place in the world, precisely because it
mostly took place walled up in the ivory tower. Did it have “real” social and
cultural meaning, I wondered.

Here on Tumblr there are concentric circles of people,
across national borders, and across age ranges, sharing the active, excited,
analysis of media texts with one another. Here be joy and knowledge-sharing – fantastic!
Because textual analysis shared, has the ability to make films and television
shows and anime and gaming richer. That’s why people reblog “meta”, right?
Because they want to join the conversation, because now they’ve seen something
they hadn’t seen before, because it’s made the film or the episode resonate in
a new way for them, or maybe because they passionately disagree with that
analysis and want to offer their own. How wonderful.

So, you go, meta writers!

There is no such thing as “overthinking” a media text. Why
would you want to use your intelligence and your imagination less, when you can
use it more? If you engage with meta, whether as a writer or a reader, I
guarantee that your imaginative and cultural life, your inner and intellectual
worlds, will be richer, and deeper. You will learn things and you will ignite
in yourselves the desire to learn. And as such, you will be active citizens of
the world, moreover you will be part of a community of active citizens of the
world – better able to change the world, together, rather than just to sit
passively in it.   

Therefore, praise be to meta.