i’m at work, sadly (stupid education filter on my internet) or I would be flailing at you loudly and screaming and linking ALL THE THINGS.
There is subtext everyfuckingwhere. Unintentionally, as we know. BUT IT. IS. THERE.
Eowyn-Dernhelm – hello genderfluid character idea.
Frodo and Sam have some seriously eyebrow-raising dialogue. Also Frodo living with Sam and Rosie at Bag End post-war? (POLY QP HOBBITS AMIRITE, possibly QP ACE FRODO?? AAAAAH)
Legolas and Gimli have some SERIOUSLY SERIOUSLY EYEBROW-RAISING DIALOGUE AND SITUATIONS. (and a happily-ever-after ffs, sailing into the sunset oh my god tolkien, we get it) – like, to the point where Tolkien Scholars from as far back as the 70′s sighed and accepted a queer reading of these two, it is not subtle at alllll, THEY are not subtle at ALL
Faramir and his starry-eyed worship of Aragorn i stg
Bilbo the queer solitary confirmed bachelor in land full of gigantic nuclear families…
there’s lots. LOTS. I’m not even touching the Silm.
I’m sure if you go to Google Scholar and search for ‘character name +subtext’ SOMETHING WILL COME UP that you can use 🙂
I would love to read your paper. Seriously. I would LOVE that.